|
|
 |
LIONSGATE IN DEAL WITH YOUTUBE
Thursday, July 17 2008
|
|
In a landscape-changing decision, Lionsgate said Wednesday that it would allow YouTube users to watch scenes from its movies, even reedit and repost them, in return for a share of revenue from advertising accompanying the clips. Curt Marvis, Lionsgate's president of digital media, suggested in an interview with today's (Thursday) Los Angeles Times that the studio is flying blind in its deal with YouTube. "One of the best ways to find out how to deal with this new age of digital distribution is to get in there and figure it out," he said. Lionsgate has not yet decided which films it intends to provide to YouTube or whether restrictions will be placed on their reuse. He suggested that the clips might be linked to a website where the full version of the movie might be offered for sale or streaming rental. Meanwhile, TiVo said that beginning today, its subscribers will be able to stream YouTube videos onto their TV sets via their TiVo boxes.
|
GOOGLE SPURNS NEW VIACOM DEMAND
Monday, July 14 2008
Google
has
refused
to
provide
Viacom
with
information
about
whether
YouTube
employees
have
uploaded
clips
of
Viacom-owned
movies
or
television
shows
to
the
online
video
service,
according
to
CNET
News.
Google
has
said
that
it
agreed
to
turn
over
information
about
viewing
activity
to
Viacom,
provided
that
it
could
be
"anonymalized."
The
website
quoted
sources
as
saying
that
if
"Chad
Hurley,
one
of
YouTube's
co-founders,
uploaded
a
copyright
video
or
viewed
them,
Viacom's
lawyers
believe
(more)
GOOGLE WON'T FIGHT ORDER TO TURN OVER YOUTUBE RECORDS
Tuesday, July 8 2008
Google
has
no
intention
of
challenging
a
judge's
order
that
its
YouTube
unit
turn
over
to
Viacom
information
about
users
who
viewed
videos
on
the
website.
However,
it
said
that
it
would
attempt
to
keep
the
identity
of
the
users
anonymous,
since,
it
said,
"IP
addresses
and
user
names
aren't
necessary
to
determine
general
viewing
practices."
Google
also
assured
YouTube
users
that
"IP
addresses
identify
a
computer,
not
the
person
using
it.
It's
not
possible
(more)
|
 |
|
|